More and more company’s are becoming involved in social media. Some brands attempt to foster an online community or create online personas - to mixed reviews. Getting these types of endeavors off the ground is a huge undertaking and in no way should be attempted without a little research and hands-on experience. There’s nothing worse then awkward participation by someone unfamiliar or uncomfortable with social media. I don’t think McDonald’s needs a Twitter profile, I don’t think anyone read Kmart’s blog, and Microsoft's "advertars" (Avatars generated by advertisers to pimp their products in MMOs and virtual worlds) while creative and clever isn't the best idea. I believe it's important to know about the historical precedents in order to tailor a strategy for adaption and integration.
Online communities aren't as new as you might assume; they actually started with the creation of MUDS in 1975. Cyberculture, screen names, moderation, forums, avatars all came from these innovative games. Game creators learned very early on that one person can’t monitor everything and enlisted hardcore gamers to become the eyes and ears within the game; thereby, allowing the creators to focus on enhancing the overall experience. Moderators were provided with the tools to refocus fellow gamers - idle minds lend to idle hands. The role of a moderator is not to police other players, but to positively challenge them. I have observed that our current online communities operate quite similarly.
There are all kinds of ways to enhance the online experience. Apps and Widgets allow users to come to you instead of the other way around. By being dynamic and linkable they add a valuable service.(Going mobile is a great way to get ready for what's to come in the near future.) Another great innovation is trivia games and recommendation tools. Thanks to social media users can rate products and services negating the need for traditional marketing surveys. Also through association you can become memorable. Contributing to the experience in a positive way should be an objective instead of lurking in the shadows and noting every negative comment. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) created a Virtual Tsunami in Second Life. It is not only a great example of eLearning it also illustrates how to become apart of an online community by enhancing the experience.
Another example is Sugar Inc. which focuses on creating communities for women between the ages of 18-49 and boasts 8 million monthly unique visitors and more than 50 million page views. Because the experience is transparent advertisers can speak to consumers directly without having to jump up and down to get their attention. The Sugar Network is comprised of 16 distinct lifestyle and entertainment sites covering topics that include celebrity, fashion, shopping, beauty, entertainment, food, health, etc. ShopStyle integrates fashion and design trends through social media and commerce tools to create a personalized shopping experience. Sugar Inc. has managed to create sites that feel as though the user is existing within a fashion magazine. Another shopping site called Threadless invites community members to submit t-shirt designs online, and the designs are then put to a public vote. A small percentage of submitted designs are selected for printing and sold through an online store. Creators of the winning designs receive a prize of cash and store credit. Also of notable mention: ebay, etsy, and Kaboodle.
I’m far more interested to engage with a brand through play then stark advertising that interrupts my regular online activities. As an example, if I went into a store and the sales staff kept trying to force me to buy a jacket that wasn’t my size and didn’t interest me I’d quickly run out the nearest exit. Advertising within an online community can be a delicate art. The best way to engage an audience is to provide them with a service that adds value to the user experience. Think of a street vendor selling hot dogs - setting up at rush hour in front of a bus stop might get you a few customers; however, setting up at lunch time inside a business park or beside a nightclub at last call is far better idea. Knowing your customer and giving them what they want at the right time is vital to increasing conversion.
Read more about "social commerce".
Usability Focused SEO Strategies
Recently I had a brief phone call with someone asking me how to ensure a website quickly shows up in the first page of a search engine result. I offered that showing up in organic search can take time, and a fast solution is pay per click. Conducting an entire site overhaul is commonly what it takes to show up in the top results of an organic search. There are also simple tricks to show up in local search results. Geotargeting is an easy way for locals to find you.
Years ago, SEO was an extremely dry concept entailing keyword strategies and primitive analytics as clairvoyant as a Magic Eight Ball. (Anyone who tells you they can read a users’ mind using a heat map is a charlatan.) The answer to a question such as this one is not simple and can’t be summarized without insight into a company’s objectives and core demographic. Also, the truth of the matter is that SEO has far surpassed traditional online marketing and keyword selection. SEO starts with good development strategies and ends with consistent testing. Knowing your user and seeing your site through their eyes is the best way to developing fine-tuned optimization.
To start, knowing that web browsers are the point of entry should help in determining keyword selection. I think it’s a good idea to know what the experience is like in both the latest version and preceding version of Firefox and Internet Explorer. Not only test that your site is efficient and bug-free, but conduct regular outside user testing to gain insight into how users find your website. As an example the Awesome Bar in Firefox slowly adapts to a user’s preferences and offers better fitting matches when entering a URL. Firefox can also tell websites your physical location resulting in more relevant and useful results (for example, getting directions or finding restaurants nearby). Another idea is to consider what languages are most common in specific regions. Certain browsers can translate site copy; however, it's not always perfect and you might want to consider providing translated versions of your site. I recommend using Google Trends for Websites to find out more about keywords based on regional statistics. Knowing what capabilities exist within a browser will help you know how to optimize the user experience and improve SEO.
An important element of SEO development is ensuring your content is properly categorized, labeled, and indexed. Amazon.com is a great example of how to label and index content. The site is consistent with it’s use of titles and descriptions which lends to optimal searching - both internally and externally. Search Engines such as Google dislike Dynamic URLs. Masking dynamic content using URL Rewrite will optimize the pages of your site. Also, creating an XML site map and using Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) to assist crawlers in locating the important content is an easy and important undertaking. Always remember that content is king, and duplications or sloppy organization can ruin SEO.
Linking and navigation are also vital to improving SEO. The easier it is to get around your site the better the overall experience for everyone - both users and bots. Google’s Webmaster Guidelines clearly states that it is important to ensure there is a clear hierarchy of content and text links. “Every page should be reachable from at least one static text link.“ Another vital element is to employ robots.txt to prevent crawling of search results pages or other auto-generated pages that don't add much value for users coming from search engines. Using my previous example, Amazon is a great site to model after in terms of it’s use of linkage. Internal links whisk you through near flawless navigation while external links and widgets are fun to use and easy to setup. Amazon’s affiliate program is one of the best I’ve seen and it’s resulting traffic is phenomenal. Amazon’s online presence stems from a quality website and utilization of online partnerships. The more sites that link back to yours means you must be important or at the very least extremely popular.
In conclusion, the whole point to the beautifully simplistic algorithm deployed by leading search engines is to ensure a quality experience for the user. The 1990 attitude of “if you build it they will come” doesn’t cut the mustard anymore. Your website needs to work well, actually know it’s audience, and be setup as a service to the user. All the marketing in the world can't make a site run better and SEO is Web Usability - contrary to what some may believe you can't enhance the experience by adding a blog. The purpose of a quality search experience is to present the user with the information they want to find; not send them to content masquerading as important in a desperate attempt to gain more site traffic. Always ask yourself, "does this have value?" if not loose it and focus on what matters most.
**BTW, Are there any developers out there who know whether the Rudd government decision to mandate online filtering, and to retrofit it to a decentralized network architecture has any ill effect on search?
Years ago, SEO was an extremely dry concept entailing keyword strategies and primitive analytics as clairvoyant as a Magic Eight Ball. (Anyone who tells you they can read a users’ mind using a heat map is a charlatan.) The answer to a question such as this one is not simple and can’t be summarized without insight into a company’s objectives and core demographic. Also, the truth of the matter is that SEO has far surpassed traditional online marketing and keyword selection. SEO starts with good development strategies and ends with consistent testing. Knowing your user and seeing your site through their eyes is the best way to developing fine-tuned optimization.
To start, knowing that web browsers are the point of entry should help in determining keyword selection. I think it’s a good idea to know what the experience is like in both the latest version and preceding version of Firefox and Internet Explorer. Not only test that your site is efficient and bug-free, but conduct regular outside user testing to gain insight into how users find your website. As an example the Awesome Bar in Firefox slowly adapts to a user’s preferences and offers better fitting matches when entering a URL. Firefox can also tell websites your physical location resulting in more relevant and useful results (for example, getting directions or finding restaurants nearby). Another idea is to consider what languages are most common in specific regions. Certain browsers can translate site copy; however, it's not always perfect and you might want to consider providing translated versions of your site. I recommend using Google Trends for Websites to find out more about keywords based on regional statistics. Knowing what capabilities exist within a browser will help you know how to optimize the user experience and improve SEO.
An important element of SEO development is ensuring your content is properly categorized, labeled, and indexed. Amazon.com is a great example of how to label and index content. The site is consistent with it’s use of titles and descriptions which lends to optimal searching - both internally and externally. Search Engines such as Google dislike Dynamic URLs. Masking dynamic content using URL Rewrite will optimize the pages of your site. Also, creating an XML site map and using Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) to assist crawlers in locating the important content is an easy and important undertaking. Always remember that content is king, and duplications or sloppy organization can ruin SEO.
Linking and navigation are also vital to improving SEO. The easier it is to get around your site the better the overall experience for everyone - both users and bots. Google’s Webmaster Guidelines clearly states that it is important to ensure there is a clear hierarchy of content and text links. “Every page should be reachable from at least one static text link.“ Another vital element is to employ robots.txt to prevent crawling of search results pages or other auto-generated pages that don't add much value for users coming from search engines. Using my previous example, Amazon is a great site to model after in terms of it’s use of linkage. Internal links whisk you through near flawless navigation while external links and widgets are fun to use and easy to setup. Amazon’s affiliate program is one of the best I’ve seen and it’s resulting traffic is phenomenal. Amazon’s online presence stems from a quality website and utilization of online partnerships. The more sites that link back to yours means you must be important or at the very least extremely popular.
In conclusion, the whole point to the beautifully simplistic algorithm deployed by leading search engines is to ensure a quality experience for the user. The 1990 attitude of “if you build it they will come” doesn’t cut the mustard anymore. Your website needs to work well, actually know it’s audience, and be setup as a service to the user. All the marketing in the world can't make a site run better and SEO is Web Usability - contrary to what some may believe you can't enhance the experience by adding a blog. The purpose of a quality search experience is to present the user with the information they want to find; not send them to content masquerading as important in a desperate attempt to gain more site traffic. Always ask yourself, "does this have value?" if not loose it and focus on what matters most.
**BTW, Are there any developers out there who know whether the Rudd government decision to mandate online filtering, and to retrofit it to a decentralized network architecture has any ill effect on search?
Yelp or not to Yelp
Several years ago on a trip to San Francisco I discovered a very resourceful website called Yelp. Heard of it? If not, there’s no doubt Yelp will be popping up in your city sometime soon. Yelp, Inc. is a Web 2.0 company that operates a social networking, user review, and local search web site of the same name. According to Wikipedia, over 25 million people access Yelp's website each month, putting it in the top 100 of U.S. Internet web sites. Founded by Jeremy Stoppelman in 2004 the site is near to becoming an international household name. In the spring of 2009 Yelp crossed the pond venturing into new UK territory.
There are lots of fantastic tales to read on Yelp, most of which come from quip personal anecdotes regarding local haunts by the site’s regular community contributors, but there is also a controversial story regarding the enterprise. An extortion claim is a journalist’s wet dream, and the question as to whether Yelp hides negative reviews for a price is an interesting concept to explore. Yelp strongly denies the allegation, but it does seem suspicious that the site seems to thrive despite little advertising. What’s the business model?
Yelp runs quite similarly to Google’s search results. Businesses can pay for top results on internal searches. In other words, sponsored results. A fantastic concept in my opinion. Users see what the community is saying, but businesses are also provided with an opportunity to get attention. In many ways, Yelp is an interactive Yellow Pages with Web 2.0 capabilities. It is also an example of how to get around the SEO minefield by using a smaller website to gain traffic and potentially increase sales.
Other tools were implemented to breakdown potential walls including a free REST- and JSON-based application programming interface (API). The API provides access to business listing details, reviews, photos, and ratings and can be used to add business information to a website, widget, or mobile application. The API has been used to integrate business reviews into existing Google Maps applications such as on Zillow.com and HotelMapSearch.com. Additionally, Yelp implemented Facebook Beacon, a part of Facebook's advertisement system that sends data from external websites to Facebook, ostensibly for the purpose of allowing targeted advertisements and allowing users to share their activities with their friends. Certain activities on partner sites are published to a user's News Feed. Yelp is also mobile and can be used on the go through Apps and a smart-phone friendly site.
Many similar sites exist, but Yelp’s success stems from it’s foundation in community framework. By using user generated content and not turning to professional writers for their reviews the end result is a cultivation of peer to peer networking that fuels habitual behavior.
There are lots of fantastic tales to read on Yelp, most of which come from quip personal anecdotes regarding local haunts by the site’s regular community contributors, but there is also a controversial story regarding the enterprise. An extortion claim is a journalist’s wet dream, and the question as to whether Yelp hides negative reviews for a price is an interesting concept to explore. Yelp strongly denies the allegation, but it does seem suspicious that the site seems to thrive despite little advertising. What’s the business model?
Yelp runs quite similarly to Google’s search results. Businesses can pay for top results on internal searches. In other words, sponsored results. A fantastic concept in my opinion. Users see what the community is saying, but businesses are also provided with an opportunity to get attention. In many ways, Yelp is an interactive Yellow Pages with Web 2.0 capabilities. It is also an example of how to get around the SEO minefield by using a smaller website to gain traffic and potentially increase sales.
Other tools were implemented to breakdown potential walls including a free REST- and JSON-based application programming interface (API). The API provides access to business listing details, reviews, photos, and ratings and can be used to add business information to a website, widget, or mobile application. The API has been used to integrate business reviews into existing Google Maps applications such as on Zillow.com and HotelMapSearch.com. Additionally, Yelp implemented Facebook Beacon, a part of Facebook's advertisement system that sends data from external websites to Facebook, ostensibly for the purpose of allowing targeted advertisements and allowing users to share their activities with their friends. Certain activities on partner sites are published to a user's News Feed. Yelp is also mobile and can be used on the go through Apps and a smart-phone friendly site.
Many similar sites exist, but Yelp’s success stems from it’s foundation in community framework. By using user generated content and not turning to professional writers for their reviews the end result is a cultivation of peer to peer networking that fuels habitual behavior.
Reading in the Brave New World
We exist in a consumer society - I hope I’m not stating anything new to you with that statement. Our current challenge is how to remain hardcore consumers while minimizing our carbon footprint. I’d say, reducing the amount of bleached, heavily treated paper is a good start.
After years working for a major book retailer I can assess that people want options, and the way we read has been changed forever by new media. As an example, it’s surprising to discover magazines and newspapers without any online presence except to list statistical information concerning their distribution and ways to advertise. Forget about seeing an App or podcast available. Instead of embracing new directions there seems to be a sadness over the dwindling sales of printed material and traditional media. There are also concerns that modern communication and information searching tools will injure our intelligence.
Luckily there are experts on the subject and we don’t need to continue scratching our heads over how to understand the reading brain. Maryanne Wolf, is a cognitive neuroscientist and child development expert from Tufts University and author of the exceptional book, Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain
Contrary to what your 3rd grade english teacher led you to believe reading is an evolutionary exercise and doesn’t follow an intrinsically strict rule book. If language and reading were to remain the same we’d still be saying ‘thou’ and ‘shalt’ instead of ‘you’ and ‘should’. The main difference in these contemporary times is that technology is at the helm of consumption. New forms of communication are altering spelling and causing the older generations to squirm at the sight of lol, brb, and whatever other forms of new speak the kids are talking these days.
While I can’t say that I’d jump at the thought of reading a book or even short story written entirely through IM abbreviations it would be an interesting visual representation of the times. After all, isn’t that what most art tries to achieve? The classics that define our culture will never die because adaption ensures their survival.
Finally, tools such as Literature Map will take care of those pesky publicists who believe their opinion should dictate which books are worth reading. Peer to peer sharing and personalized recommendations are how I want to find new authors and books worth my time and money.
After years working for a major book retailer I can assess that people want options, and the way we read has been changed forever by new media. As an example, it’s surprising to discover magazines and newspapers without any online presence except to list statistical information concerning their distribution and ways to advertise. Forget about seeing an App or podcast available. Instead of embracing new directions there seems to be a sadness over the dwindling sales of printed material and traditional media. There are also concerns that modern communication and information searching tools will injure our intelligence.
Luckily there are experts on the subject and we don’t need to continue scratching our heads over how to understand the reading brain. Maryanne Wolf, is a cognitive neuroscientist and child development expert from Tufts University and author of the exceptional book, Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain
“Human beings were never born to read,” she writes, “Reading is a human invention that reflects how the brain rearranges itself to learn something new.”
Contrary to what your 3rd grade english teacher led you to believe reading is an evolutionary exercise and doesn’t follow an intrinsically strict rule book. If language and reading were to remain the same we’d still be saying ‘thou’ and ‘shalt’ instead of ‘you’ and ‘should’. The main difference in these contemporary times is that technology is at the helm of consumption. New forms of communication are altering spelling and causing the older generations to squirm at the sight of lol, brb, and whatever other forms of new speak the kids are talking these days.
While I can’t say that I’d jump at the thought of reading a book or even short story written entirely through IM abbreviations it would be an interesting visual representation of the times. After all, isn’t that what most art tries to achieve? The classics that define our culture will never die because adaption ensures their survival.
Finally, tools such as Literature Map will take care of those pesky publicists who believe their opinion should dictate which books are worth reading. Peer to peer sharing and personalized recommendations are how I want to find new authors and books worth my time and money.
What is this thing we call privacy?: Part 1
There isn’t a moment in our modern day that we aren’t confronted by someone wanting information from us. Whether it be Greenpeace good-doers soliciting donations on nearly every street corner, or a website requiring you to register as a member. There is so much information floating around us we are in a constant state of information overload. In many ways, information has become a commodity.
In fact, if you search information overload the results will illustrate nearly everyone is aware of a potential problem, but no one can be certain what to make of it. On the one hand, we adore the playfulness of social media and the ease of open communication within a network, but at the same time we are fearful that the price of these tools is too much personal information. No longer are we remote islands onto ourselves, but digital villages of white noise, colourful images, encapsulated in a blur of promotion. The ability to exist within this new world is to trade information about your true identity.
According to Roger Clarke, “cyberculture' is the concept of a group or groups of people achieving cohesion by means of the information infrastructure”. As a consultant specialising in strategic and policy aspects of eBusiness, information infrastructure, data surveillance, and privacy he is a good source on the subject. In a paper entitled Dissidentity, Clarke raises an important point regarding the psychological need for private space.
Wikipedia defines privacy as; ‘the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves and thereby reveal themselves selectively.’ To me, the reality is that no one should expect to be entirely private when online. Privacy is a relative term in the offline world and it’s no different online. There are a few colourful words to describe a person who would walk around wearing a mask and cloak. Usually, when someone has something to hide it’s because they participate in some sort of action that they believe would change other people’s perception of them. Fear of embarrassment, judgment, hate, as well as a multitude of other emotions can lead people into strange behaviours that they’d rather keep to themselves.
I can entirely appreciate the notion of privacy and why most people do not wish to have personal information disclosed without their explicit consent. When I provide my email address to a site in exchange for a newsletter, registration, or information there should be an understanding that my email addresses is not to be used for any other purposes then the agreement of which I consented. In other words, my email address should not be sold on a list for other product promotions and third parties should not contact me as a consequence of my participation in divulging my personal information. Spam is a cute name for a very big problem. Another issue is identity theft; which I'll try to tackle in another post soon.
Some believe that the World Wide Web is a virtual space, cyberculture, or cyberspace. The reality is that who we are online is not a different person from our offline selves, and the laws in which we conduct ourselves online should be in keeping with the laws that stop us from stealing and hurting people in the physical world. The ability to be intrinsically more of our darker selves or indulge our fantasies is a freedom and not a right. An abuse of freedom has the power to alter the structure of a society, or at the very least break down trust. Anarchy is a beautiful yet unrealistic dream that would sooner turn into a nightmare then a Utopic wonderland.
In fact, if you search information overload the results will illustrate nearly everyone is aware of a potential problem, but no one can be certain what to make of it. On the one hand, we adore the playfulness of social media and the ease of open communication within a network, but at the same time we are fearful that the price of these tools is too much personal information. No longer are we remote islands onto ourselves, but digital villages of white noise, colourful images, encapsulated in a blur of promotion. The ability to exist within this new world is to trade information about your true identity.
According to Roger Clarke, “cyberculture' is the concept of a group or groups of people achieving cohesion by means of the information infrastructure”. As a consultant specialising in strategic and policy aspects of eBusiness, information infrastructure, data surveillance, and privacy he is a good source on the subject. In a paper entitled Dissidentity, Clarke raises an important point regarding the psychological need for private space.
“There are many different contexts in which human behaviour depends on the freedom and constraints associated with the identities that they use.”
Wikipedia defines privacy as; ‘the ability of an individual or group to seclude themselves or information about themselves and thereby reveal themselves selectively.’ To me, the reality is that no one should expect to be entirely private when online. Privacy is a relative term in the offline world and it’s no different online. There are a few colourful words to describe a person who would walk around wearing a mask and cloak. Usually, when someone has something to hide it’s because they participate in some sort of action that they believe would change other people’s perception of them. Fear of embarrassment, judgment, hate, as well as a multitude of other emotions can lead people into strange behaviours that they’d rather keep to themselves.
I can entirely appreciate the notion of privacy and why most people do not wish to have personal information disclosed without their explicit consent. When I provide my email address to a site in exchange for a newsletter, registration, or information there should be an understanding that my email addresses is not to be used for any other purposes then the agreement of which I consented. In other words, my email address should not be sold on a list for other product promotions and third parties should not contact me as a consequence of my participation in divulging my personal information. Spam is a cute name for a very big problem. Another issue is identity theft; which I'll try to tackle in another post soon.
Some believe that the World Wide Web is a virtual space, cyberculture, or cyberspace. The reality is that who we are online is not a different person from our offline selves, and the laws in which we conduct ourselves online should be in keeping with the laws that stop us from stealing and hurting people in the physical world. The ability to be intrinsically more of our darker selves or indulge our fantasies is a freedom and not a right. An abuse of freedom has the power to alter the structure of a society, or at the very least break down trust. Anarchy is a beautiful yet unrealistic dream that would sooner turn into a nightmare then a Utopic wonderland.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)